
Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
Leaks don’t often take the wind out of my sails, however the newest particulars about Samsung’s upcoming Galaxy Watch lineup got here shut. In response to renders posted by trusted leaker Evan Blass, the Galaxy Watch 8, Galaxy Watch 8 Traditional, and the Galaxy Watch Extremely 2025 will every characteristic the identical squircle design that debuted with the unique Galaxy Watch Extremely, and, to place it softly, that’s a large disappointment.
I wasn’t a fan of the Extremely’s form at launch (or months afterward my wrist), however I held out hope that it could keep confined to only one SKU for a sure sort of purchaser. To my dismay, it seems like Samsung goes all-in on the squircle.
Would you like a completely squircle Samsung Galaxy Watch lineup?
6 votes
Let’s begin with the apparent: the squircle simply doesn’t look good. Not less than, to not me. It’s a wierd hybrid of the Apple Watch’s rounded rectangle and Samsung’s ordinary round fashion, a compromise that lands firmly in no-man’s land. A round smartwatch has all the time had a basic attraction. It looks like an precise watch and doesn’t look misplaced with a costume shirt or a leather-based strap. Sq.-faced wearables just like the Apple Watch lean closely into their tech-first identification, providing extra display actual property and sharper data format, however nonetheless that includes a refined impression.
Samsung’s squircle tries to separate the distinction and finally ends up conducting neither. It doesn’t have the magnificence of a standard watch form or the unapologetic utility of a sq. one. At finest, it feels indecisive, and at worst, it looks like a toddler’s toy. Wearables aren’t simply devices anymore, they’re equipment we put on 24/7, and appears matter. Loads of individuals could just like the squircle form, however I’m not one in every of them.
Because the saying goes, type follows perform, however right here, too, the squircle stumbles. The Galaxy Watch Extremely’s form provides noticeable bulk to the lineup, particularly for smaller-wristed of us like me. I sometimes love a big watch, however provided that its dimension is packaged with refinement and its elevated actual property delivers added usefulness.
Samsung’s squircle design doesn’t have the magnificence of a standard watch form or the unapologetic utility of a sq. one.
Merely put, if I’m going to put on one thing outsized, I need that house to be crammed with show house to ship greater menus, richer problems, and enriched consumer interactions. The squircle is chunky with out the payoff of a proportionally bigger display; it merely sacrifices consolation and utility for visible distinction I can’t get behind.
What bums me out most is how pointless this feels. Samsung has traditionally finished job of providing selection. When the revamped Galaxy Watch 4 sequence arrived to usher in a brand new period of Put on OS, customers obtained the selection of a sporty or basic construct. The Galaxy Watch 5 sequence echoed that two-pronged strategy with a Galaxy Watch 5 Professional and an everyday Galaxy Watch 5 mannequin. Even final yr’s lineup gave us the round Galaxy Watch 7 alongside the squircle Galaxy Watch Extremely.

Kaitlyn Cimino / Android Authority
I get the will to unify the product line. Streamlining manufacturing, making a signature look, and so forth. However making all of your watches look the identical doesn’t imply they’ll enchantment to everybody. I like the domed form of the Pixel Watch line, and I like the square-ish Apple Watch Sequence. I liked the traditionally elegant Galaxy Watch line and its elevated Traditional fashions.
The rotating bezel is perhaps making its method again to wrists with the Galaxy Watch 8 Traditional, nevertheless it doesn’t give the identical analog watch vibes on a chubby rectangle. I understand the squircle could enchantment to some individuals, however I simply want Samsung hadn’t painted your complete lineup with the identical broad stroke.
TL;DR: I hate the squircle. I need choices. Samsung trimming each watch into the identical questionable form isn’t forward-thinking; it’s chopping corners. Actually.
