One of many first casualties of the second Trump administration has been the US Company for Worldwide Growth (USAID).
The company, which funds and operates humanitarian support packages all internationally, has shortly turn into a goal for Republicans. Over the previous 4 weeks, the White Home has been pursuing a plan to cut back USAID’s workforce from over 10,000 individuals to only about 290. The hassle has gone to this point that, in Washington, DC, indicators for the company have both been lined in black tape or eliminated totally.
There are many the explanation why the Trump administration — and Elon Musk’s so-called Division of Authorities Effectivity (DOGE) — may be so fixated on USAID particularly. It may very well be a part of their effort to dramatically scale back federal spending, utilizing USAID as a trial run earlier than dismantling different authorities businesses. Or it may very well be that Trump and his allies see little worth in overseas support. But when this actually was a case of saving taxpayer cash, as they declare, it doesn’t make a lot sense; within the final fiscal yr, USAID spent lower than 1 p.c of the federal finances.
However the Trump administration’s assault on USAID does inform us one thing broader about Republicans’ view on authorities spending — particularly, what they could contemplate to be wasteful spending: packages that assist the poor. And the way in which they’ve justified the dismantling of USAID — by categorizing it as rife with fraud and mismanagement — could give us a glimpse into how they are going to method home welfare packages.
An announcement from the White Home earlier this month lamented that USAID has, apparently, “been unaccountable to taxpayers because it funnels huge sums of cash to the ridiculous — and, in lots of circumstances, malicious — pet tasks of entrenched bureaucrats.”
It doesn’t matter that the billions of {dollars} that USAID spends have supported life-saving meals distribution and STD-prevention packages. And it doesn’t matter that USAID’s famine warning system helps organizations world wide decide the place to deploy humanitarian aid. What issues to Trump and his allies are the tales — a few of which, it ought to be famous, aren’t even true — that help their argument that fundamental humanitarian help packages are riddled with waste and abuse.
Successfully shutting down USAID may have main penalties for thousands and thousands of individuals overseas, and it also needs to function a warning for individuals who care about antipoverty packages right here at house. When packages like meals stamps or Medicaid are on the chopping block, likelihood is Republicans are going to show to the identical argument: These packages are wasteful, so why ought to we fund them?
USAID in the present day. Medicaid tomorrow?
All through the presidential marketing campaign, Trump promised to not lower packages like Medicare and Medicaid, however the pink flags have been arduous to overlook. “There’s a lot you are able to do when it comes to entitlements, when it comes to slicing and when it comes to additionally the theft and the dangerous administration of entitlements,” he advised CNBC in March of final yr.
And that’s precisely how Trump and his allies are framing their potential assaults on Medicaid now. (Not like USAID, Medicaid is almost 10 p.c of the federal finances, making it a extra interesting goal for the Trump administration in the event that they’re trying to drastically lower spending.) He not too long ago advised reporters that he’ll “love and cherish” Medicaid, however added one caveat: “We’re not going to do something with that,” he stated, “until we are able to discover some abuse or waste.”
Positive sufficient, when Trump nominated Dr. Mehmet Oz to function the administrator of the Facilities for Medicare and Medicaid Providers (CMS), he stated that Oz would “lower waste and fraud inside our nation’s costliest authorities company.” And earlier this month, Musk’s DOGE aides began working at CMS, the place, in accordance with the Wall Avenue Journal, they’ve gained entry to important cost and contracting techniques. The DOGE aides have been tasked with discovering fraud.
To make certain, Medicaid and Medicare, like every authorities program, are under no circumstances excellent and do expertise fraud and mismanagement. However the Trump administration is tremendously exaggerating how a lot cash they are going to save by tackling fraud in these packages. “At this level, I’m 100% sure that the magnitude of the fraud in federal entitlements (Social Safety, Medicare, Medicaid, Welfare, Incapacity, and so on) exceeds the mixed sum of each personal rip-off you’ve ever heard by FAR,” Musk tweeted final week. “It’s not even shut.”
That declare, nonetheless, isn’t rooted in actuality, until Musk is aware of one thing we don’t and isn’t sharing it. One quantity that the federal government typically cites when evaluating these packages’ effectivity is the “improper cost charge,” which represents funds that don’t meet CMS necessities for varied causes, together with inadequate documentation, overpaying, or underpaying. In 2024, Medicaid’s improper cost charge was roughly 5 p.c. Whereas a few of that may be a results of fraud, abuse, or mismanagement, the overwhelming majority of it’s a results of inadequate documentation, in accordance with a CMS report.
The issue is that if Republicans are really involved with wasteful spending, they wouldn’t focus their efforts on proscribing welfare entry by imposing measures like work necessities, which have been confirmed to be ineffective. When Georgia imposed its work necessities on Medicaid, for instance, its administrative prices ballooned, with the vast majority of its Medicaid spending going towards implementing its work reporting necessities.
Republican efforts to cut back Medicaid and different welfare packages have by no means been about stopping fraud or abuse. They’ve at all times been about shrinking the social security internet, partially to assist fund tax cuts for individuals who don’t want them. And with Musk’s plan to chop some $2 trillion in authorities spending, it’s clear the highway to getting even remotely near that determine goes by entitlement cuts. Just like the assault on USAID, Republicans will say they’re merely concentrating on fraud and abuse, however their definition of wasteful spending will probably have much less to do with precise waste or corruption and extra to do with cash that goes towards serving to the poor.
This story was featured within the Inside Our Means e-newsletter. Join right here.