
Hadlee Simons / Android Authority
HUAWEI, then Samsung, debuted 10x cameras a number of years in the past, providing a still-unprecedented stage of attain for even the greatest trendy digital camera telephones. Sadly, the Galaxy S23 Extremely was the final of Samsung’s flagships with this far-reaching zoom. It’s a little bit of a disgrace that the Galaxy S25 Extremely has caught with the 5x possibility. I loved my time with the S22 Extremely and S23 Extremely’s long-range lenses and had hoped that producers would construct on this tech by now.
It hasn’t been doom-and-gloom on the zoom entrance, although. We’ve since seen a number of telephones boast 200MP periscope cameras that may make up the shortfall. One in every of these is the vivo X200 Professional, and I assumed it was arguably the very best of the bunch due to its 200MP 3.7x digital camera. However I used to be curious to see how this digital camera held as much as the S23 Extremely’s 10x optical zoom. Thankfully, I’ve each telephones available to see which strategy reigns supreme.
Can megapixels beat optics?

Hadlee Simons / Android Authority
A deeper have a look at the long-range zoom digital camera setups reveals wildly totally different approaches. The Galaxy S23 Extremely makes use of a 10MP sensor (1.12-micron pixels) with 10x periscope optics, choosing low decision however the next native zoom issue. Samsung’s lens has a really slim f/4.9 aperture and a 1/3.52-inch sensor measurement, which is small even for a 10MP or 12MP digital camera.
The vivo X200 Professional’s zoom digital camera setup is on the opposite finish of the spectrum. The telephone brings a 200MP sensor with a 3.7x periscope lens, delivering a a lot decrease native zoom issue however with hundreds extra megapixels. The agency additionally makes use of a large f/2.6 aperture and an HP2 sensor that’s a a lot bigger 1/1.4 inches in measurement. vivo is clearly hoping that each one these megapixels can lead to higher hybrid zoom. The digital camera has tiny 0.6-micron pixels with which to seize mild, however vivo depends on pixel-binning to take brighter, cleaner pictures.
Daytime capturing: A better battle than I anticipated
We begin issues off with an indoor comparability, a stack of online game circumstances. The tiny textual content and diminished lighting ought to make for a good problem right here. The primary main distinction I seen was the sheer stage of noise within the Samsung photograph, significantly on the left-hand aspect. Against this, the vivo does an excellent job of decreasing noise. I assumed the X200 Professional additionally goes a little bit overboard in locations relating to sharpening, such because the PlayStation-branded plastic cowl and a few textual content, however it’s nonetheless the extra shareable photograph of the 2. In saying so, the vivo isn’t miles forward relating to pure element.
What about pictures of individuals? Each telephones flip in good outcomes throughout the day. I do take umbrage with the Samsung telephone’s coloration replica, although, giving me a jaundiced hue as compared. You additionally begin to see notable variations when pixel-peeping, with noise ranges as soon as once more creeping up within the Samsung photograph. Against this, the vivo handset managed to maintain noise ranges in verify and supply lots extra element with out cranking up the sharpness to unreasonable ranges. It’s not good, although, as the perimeters of my shirt are barely ghosted. Nevertheless it’s not one thing you’d simply discover.
What about pictures of pets? Our personal testing beforehand confirmed that Samsung’s Extremely telephones undergo from shutter lag, which isn’t very best for pets and children. Thankfully, we’ve obtained a canine that may really sit nonetheless (for just a few seconds). I wasn’t pleased with both telephone’s white steadiness; the vivo telephone was manner too heat for my liking whereas the Samsung was too cool, however the S23 Extremely was nearer to what the scene appeared like. Nevertheless, the X200 Professional gives superior element right here, significantly when high quality particulars just like the canine’s eyebrows and snout. Try beneath for a better look.
I then cranked the zoom well beyond 10x and obtained some very fascinating outcomes. Try this 30x comparability, which reveals a mountain in broad daylight.
Neither telephone turns in consequence, however I assumed the vivo picture was noticeably worse due to extra over-sharpening and heavy distinction that’s typical of struggling long-range hybrid zoom. What’s even worse is that there’s clear fringing on the perimeters of the roof, significantly the place the roof meets the mountain. I get the distinct feeling {that a} native 10x zoom helps in these eventualities, providing a shorter high quality hole to bridge.
One other 30x daytime comparability does vivo no favors. The cruel oversharpening is clear when wanting on the brick wall, the foliage, and the grass itself because the telephone desperately searches for any trace of element to focus on. The X200 Professional additionally cranks the distinction to disagreeable ranges. Each telephones show fringing alongside the rails, however Samsung’s handset undoubtedly comes out on high right here.
Low-light: The place the S23 Extremely 10x digital camera reveals its age
Telephoto and periscope cameras have historically struggled when the solar goes down. Does the vivo X200 Professional’s tele digital camera with a wider aperture, bigger sensor, extra megapixel, and pixel-binning repay for the 200MP digital camera at evening or does Samsung’s extra typical, lower-resolution digital camera with bigger pixels produce higher outcomes?
Beginning off with 10x zoom, we see acquainted traits as soon as once more. To my eye, vivo aggressively reduces noise and cranks up the sharpness to the purpose you may see some halos across the textual content. Samsung’s rendition is considerably noisier, and also you don’t have to pixel-peep to see it. Check out the restaurant signal within the background, although, and it’s clear that the S23 Extremely captured the same stage of element because the X200 Professional. So it actually comes down as to if you worth a extra processed look or a natural-looking picture. I feel the perfect picture for me is someplace within the center, however the vivo is nearer to reaching that purpose.
Switching to 30x, the vivo gives some well-defined textual content right here, due to a largely tasteful stage of sharpening. The Samsung picture remains to be legible, however it’s noticeably extra smudged as compared. Neither telephone does a incredible job with the orange/yellow lights above the restaurant signal, however you may nonetheless principally rely the lights within the vivo picture whereas the S23 Extremely has blown them out. I do know which photograph I’d use if I wanted to ship these particulars to somebody.
The Galaxy S23 Extremely actually didn’t cope properly with this scene. The 10x shot is sort of fully illegible, and the image is delicate usually. The S23 Extremely additionally took a barely darker picture, however I don’t actually thoughts this, on condition that it was night-time, in spite of everything. Switching to the vivo X200 Professional, I had no hassle in any respect studying most of this signal whereas the telephone did job of cleansing up noise and conserving issues sharp. It nonetheless goes overboard with the sharpness in locations, such because the wood playground. Nevertheless it’s a small worth to pay for a noticeably superior picture.
The vivo holds the lead once we zoom in to 30x, delivering legible textual content and not one of the blur seen within the Samsung picture. It’s clear that the X200 Professional’s high quality element seize suffers, as evidenced by some wonky-looking letters, however the S23 Extremely undoubtedly fares worse.
Which telephone takes higher long-range zoom pictures usually?
5 votes
I miss 10x cameras in 2025

Harley Maranan / Android Authority
Our Samsung Galaxy S23 Extremely vs vivo X200 Professional 10x shootout has certainly produced a winner, because the vivo handset gained most of those comparisons in my e-book. No surprise the likes of Xiaomi and HONOR have jumped on the 200MP telephoto digital camera bandwagon. All these megapixels, in live performance with pixel-binning and a large aperture, lead to a digital camera that may go properly past its 3.7x native zoom issue.
Nevertheless, the Galaxy S23 Extremely nonetheless stunned me by exhibiting that even an growing old 10x digital camera has extra to present in 2025. Daytime comparisons at 30x present that Samsung’s 2023 telephone can nonetheless compete with a few of the greatest digital camera telephones, suggesting that there’s no substitute for optics in some conditions. It additionally doesn’t harm that the S23 Extremely gives a pure have a look at 10x or larger in comparison with the extra processed look of many rival handsets. Moreover, Samsung allows you to use the 10x digital camera in its Professional modes.
We in all probability gained’t see extra 10x cameras within the close to future, although. These long-range periscope digital camera setups require numerous inside area for a number of prisms/mirrors and to create the space wanted for the lengthy focal size within the first place. This leaves little room for a decently sized sensor. However, I actually hope we see extra trendy 10x cameras within the coming years, as the probabilities for long-range zoom high quality stay intriguing.
