We’re breaking down how AI may influence enterprise networks in data-driven deep dives. Utilizing TeleGeography’s WAN Price Benchmark—a personalized platform that makes it simple to mannequin and monitor your WAN community prices—we’re modeling potential real-life community setups and configurations for AI.
In these posts, we’re evaluating the overall value of possession (TCO) of a legacy MPLS community—one that also represents many multinationals’ WANs in 2025—to varied hybrid or internet-first alternate options designed to accommodate adjustments introduced by AI and cloud. Whereas our argument for transferring previous MPLS-centered WANs was traditionally principally about value, it’s now far more about getting the community proper sized for the approaching AI-driven bandwidth crunch, resiliency, app-specific coverage and efficiency, and full utilization of cloud.
That is the final put up of this sequence. Meet up with the primary three posts:
Hub and Spoke WAN
Earlier analyses on this sequence explored tiered hybrid fashions and internet-first methods, each of which leverage the pliability and cost-effectiveness of web connectivity, managed and secured by an SD-WAN overlay. However on this put up, we look at essentially the most radical revision but: the Hub and Spoke WAN.
The Hub and Spoke WAN mannequin represents a major problem to a basic assumption of recent networking: the necessity for ubiquitous any-to-any connectivity. As an alternative of a meshed non-public community, reminiscent of MPLS, or a versatile overlay, like SD-WAN, this structure entails creating a personal, “carrier-like” community the place department places of work (“spokes”) are instantly tethered to regional information facilities (“hubs”).
Adopting such a “carrier-like” community represents greater than a technological shift; it indicators a basic transformation within the enterprise’s IT operational mannequin. The group transitions from being a passive shopper of a managed WAN service to an lively supervisor of its personal non-public spine. This new position entails sourcing and managing a various set of parts for the spine and doubtlessly co-location services for the hubs themselves. This shifts the duty for end-to-end community efficiency, routing integrity throughout the core, and long-term capability planning from the provider to the in-house IT staff. The choice, subsequently, can hinge as a lot on a corporation’s inside capabilities because it does on the technological deserves of the structure.
Modeling a Hub and Spoke WAN
These are the adjustments we applied at every WAN web site tier to create such a community:
- DCs— We added a spine of huge bandwidth wavelengths between the information facilities.
- All Tiers—One DIA port of the same pace to the unique MPLS, together with an EoMPLS non-public line of the same pace again to the closest regional information middle. We included native entry to all DIA websites, excluding these in the US, Canada, and Western Europe.
- We stored MPLS for the Chinese language websites for personal connectivity at these websites, reasonably than the DIA (we nonetheless added non-public strains for these websites).
- As a result of the places of work have a direct non-public connection, there isn’t any have to undertake SD-WAN.
So why would an enterprise forgo SD-WAN, the market’s main expertise pattern? The reply lies in what this structure prioritizes as an alternative of final flexibility.
As a result of all non-public visitors from a spoke has a single, deterministic vacation spot—its designated hub—the advanced, dynamic path choice and coverage enforcement of SD-WAN turns into pointless. This architectural selection has profound implications for each value and operational complexity. With essential company visitors to the information middle going by way of non-public strains, safety can be a lot less complicated than in a hybrid or internet-first WAN structure.
For a selected class of enterprise, the advantages of absolute visitors isolation on non-public strains, radically simplified routing logic, and enhanced management over the community core outweigh the benefits of a totally meshed, internet-centric design. This isn’t a legacy structure, however a contemporary, strategic selection for organizations whose enterprise necessities demand safety and predictability above all else.
Common Complete Bandwidth per Website in Every Subregion—Twin MPLS WAN vs. Hub and Spoke WAN
Observe: Every bar represents the typical whole web site bandwidth, together with a number of ports or underlay companies, throughout all websites within the listed subregion.
- The Hub and Spoke community is basically the identical bandwidth as the unique MPLS WAN. We did this to make the comparability as one-for-one as attainable with an MPLS community and since bandwidth is much less of a difficulty in a P2P state of affairs the place visitors is on a personal community destined for the information middle.
- In some places, the typical bandwidth is barely down, whereas it was extra more likely to go up a bit in locations the place we swapped a decrease capability MPLS port with a barely bigger non-public line.
- All P2P connections, besides these between information facilities, bought an entry line.
Distribution of Complete Website Speeds—Hub and Spoke WAN
Observe: Every part represents the share of whole web site bandwidths that fall inside every bandwidth vary.
- Within the unique, we had been including collectively two identically sized MPLS ports. Right here we’re including collectively the DIA port and the EoMPLS line, that are often barely completely different speeds however very shut.
- Over half of the websites on this community have a complete web site bandwidth of 200 Mbps or beneath.
- About 10% of websites have a complete web site bandwidth above 1,000 Mbps.
Unique Twin MPLS and Hub and Spoke WAN State of affairs TCOs
Observe: Every column represents the overall annual value of possession for that WAN situation, damaged out by product in every colour part.
- Whereas the bandwidth is basically the identical, the Hub and Spoke community is extra reasonably priced, with the TCO lowering about 12% from $8.1m to $7.1m.
- This community is inherently safe (delicate company visitors goes over non-public strains not on shared infrastructure) and resilient (EPL over a meshed community) even when it lacks the power to share information between any two random places of work on the community.
- Entry is almost all of the price of the community–57%–with the subsequent largest share going to the non-public strains at 23%.
- There aren’t any extra SD-WAN prices, which retains the worth down in comparison with different situations.
The Hub and Spoke mannequin analyzed right here is outlined by its deliberate omission of an SD-WAN overlay. As an alternative, the enterprise successfully builds its personal non-public spine connecting key regional hubs, with all different websites connecting to this core. It is a trendy, hybrid structure that blends non-public and public connectivity with a transparent objective for every, and is customized for AI, particularly as including incremental bandwidth to EoMPLS hyperlinks shall be easy and cost-effective.
The Hub and Spoke mannequin’s readiness for AI is rooted in its centralized structure, which instantly addresses the distinctive visitors patterns and information necessities of synthetic intelligence workloads. By centralizing compute and information in well-connected hubs, the Hub and Spoke mannequin creates an environment friendly and safe atmosphere that’s purpose-built for the calls for of large-scale AI mannequin coaching and inference.
Mannequin Your Personal WAN
You do not have to make costly commitments to learn the way a lot your WAN will value. TeleGeography’s WAN Price Benchmark platform allows you to mannequin your WAN community, strive completely different configurations, and get actual insights into how your funds shall be impacted.
Some enterprises prioritize chopping prices, however we extra generally see enterprise prospects use TeleGeography’s WAN Price Benchmark platform to arrange a extra resilient and higher performing, AI-ready community with out having to ask the c-suite for extra money. You’ll be able to get extra particulars and a video tour right here.
WAN Managers: We Wish to Hear From You
Are you a WAN architect or IT infrastructure skilled? Do you’re employed with networks at a non-telecom provider enterprise?
Take our WAN Supervisor Survey to grasp how enterprises like yours are designing their underlays to stability AI-driven bandwidth calls for, prices, and efficiency.
Your response to our temporary 10-20 query survey will earn you free entry to the total report in addition to a TeleGeography infrastructure wall map! Click on right here for the survey.