15+ AI Fashions Which might be Smarter Than You

The common human IQ is 100. Statistical reality – not an insult. For many years, that quantity has quietly outlined what we meant by “regular intelligence.” However in 2025, one thing unusual is going on. Machines with no consciousness, no feelings, and no lived expertise at the moment are scoring larger than people on the very checks designed to measure human intelligence. Does that imply AI fashions, particularly the newest ones like Gemini 3 and GPT-5.2, are smarter than most of us people?

A number of massive language fashions have been examined on IQ-style benchmarks over the previous 12 months. These embody logic puzzles, summary reasoning checks, sample recognition duties, and problem-solving challenges. The outcomes are onerous to disregard. Mannequin after mannequin is matching, and in lots of instances surpassing, the efficiency of a median human. Not in a selected activity, however throughout a number of dimensions of reasoning that IQ checks care about.

This text appears at 15+ AI fashions which might be smarter than you, at the very least by IQ-style requirements. We are going to break down what “sensible” actually means right here, how these fashions are evaluated, and why this shift issues.

First, let’s work out how…

…Can We Assign IQ to an AI?

Strictly talking, we can’t. IQ was designed to measure human intelligence, formed by biology, expertise, and consciousness. An AI doesn’t suppose, really feel, or perceive the world the best way people do. So, assigning it a literal IQ rating can be scientifically incorrect.

However in apply, these comparisons are made a tad bit in a different way.

Mainly, as an alternative of asking whether or not an AI has an IQ, researchers examine how an AI mannequin performs on AI-related duties. Think about a system constantly fixing logic puzzles, pattern-recognition duties, and reasoning issues that people with an IQ of 120 or 130 sometimes remedy. If the AI mannequin does so reliably, it turns into affordable to map its efficiency to an equal IQ vary, proper?

And that’s precisely how we affiliate IQ with an AI mannequin.

This isn’t a psychological prognosis. Consider it as a efficiency benchmark. IQ right here acts as a shared language, or a approach to examine how nicely completely different programs motive below managed circumstances. And by that yardstick, a number of fashionable LLMs are already working nicely above the human common.

Which IQ Checks Consider AI Fashions?

These are traditional IQ checks, or at the very least the net variations of them. The duties inside these challenges measure reasoning, abstraction, and problem-solving reasonably than memorisation. These checks are both straight tailored from human IQ exams or intently mimic the identical cognitive abilities.

As an illustration, probably the most widespread IQ checks is Raven’s Progressive Matrices. It is a visible pattern-recognition take a look at that’s lengthy thought of culture-fair. A number of LLMs now remedy these puzzles at or above the extent of high-IQ people. Then there are Mensa-style logic checks, which embody sequence completion, image reasoning, and deductive logic. Fashionable AI fashions have proven constantly sturdy efficiency in these.

Nonetheless, language-heavy sections of IQ checks are the place LLMs actually shine. Verbal reasoning, analogies, and arithmetic issues, much like WAIS subtests, play on to their strengths. On high of that, fashionable benchmarks like BIG-Bench Onerous, ARC-style reasoning duties, and tutorial evaluations reminiscent of MMLU and Humanity’s Final Examination function sensible stand-ins for IQ testing. Whereas they don’t seem to be labelled as “IQ checks,” they measure the identical underlying skills. The essential half – LLMs are more and more outperforming nearly all of people on these checks.

See for your self.

High-rated AI fashions on IQ checks

For this explicit record, we will focus particularly on the Mensa Norway checks, and rank the AI fashions as per their rating.

1. GPT-5.2 Professional

Mensa Norway IQ: 147

That is the basis of this complete dialogue of AI fashions and their IQs. Not too long ago marking its debut, GPT-5.2 Professional has now crushed the all-time IQ rating for LLMs. Its rating – 147. As Derya Unutmaz mentions in his tweet, this type of intelligence is present in “solely lower than 1 in 1000 individuals.”

GPT-5.2 Professional constantly demonstrates this supremacy over people. Particularly so for multi-step logic, summary reasoning, and professional-grade drawback fixing. Whereas it doesn’t essentially imply it’s smarter than people in all elements, it does point out a strong shift in the place the higher bounds of test-measured intelligence now sit.

2. GPT-5.2 Pondering

Mensa Norway IQ: 141

Subsequent up is the considering sibling of the newly launched GPT-5.2. On the Mensa Norway IQ take a look at, GPT-5.2 Pondering scores round 141, putting it nicely past the human common of 100 and comfortably above the standard Mensa qualification threshold. In human phrases, this rating corresponds to the highest 1–2% of the inhabitants, purely on summary reasoning and sample recognition.

What this end result really tells us may be very particular. GPT-5.2 Pondering performs exceptionally nicely on duties that require figuring out relationships, recognizing visible or logical patterns, and making use of constant guidelines throughout a number of steps. These are the precise skills IQ checks are designed to isolate, impartial of language, emotion, or area information.

This principally signifies that, so far as structured reasoning below managed circumstances is anxious, GPT-5.2 Pondering operates at a degree most people by no means attain.

3. Gemini 3 Professional Preview

Mensa Norway IQ: 141

Proper alongside GPT-5.2 Pondering sits Gemini 3 Professional Preview, matching its Mensa Norway IQ rating completely. This locations Google’s flagship reasoning mannequin firmly in elite territory, far above the human baseline and nicely previous the edge sometimes related to excessive mental capability.

In sensible phrases, it means Gemini 3 Professional Preview performs reliably on summary reasoning challenges. Such checks often require rule discovery, sample continuation, and logical elimination. These are issues the place guessing fails shortly. You’ll be able to solely rating this excessive with structured inference.

This rating thus displays Gemini 3 Professional Preview’s power in managed reasoning environments.

4. Grok 4 Professional Mode

Mensa Norway IQ: 137

In fact, you may’t communicate of intelligence and hold an Elon Musk-backed product out of the record. Shut behind the highest scorers sits Grok 4 Professional Mode. Whereas barely decrease than the very high tier, the mannequin is nicely throughout the vary of remarkable human intelligence and comfortably above the common benchmark of 100.

The rating highlights Grok 4 Professional Mode’s capability to deal with logic-driven duties with readability and management. It performs nicely on sample recognition, summary relationships, and elimination-based reasoning – the core elements of IQ-style checks.

In easy phrases, Grok 4 Professional Mode demonstrates sturdy analytical reasoning below take a look at circumstances. Whereas it could not high the chart, its efficiency confirms that it operates far past human-average reasoning ranges when evaluated purely on logic and pattern-based intelligence.

5. GPT-5.2 Professional (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 135

Not far behind its text-only counterpart is GPT-5.2 Professional Imaginative and prescient, scoring 135 on the Mensa Norway take a look at. This nonetheless locations it firmly throughout the vary of very excessive human intelligence. That is nicely above each the worldwide common and the standard threshold related to superior reasoning capability.

Observe that this rating comes from a vision-enabled mannequin – an AI mannequin that may course of and motive over visible data (like enter photographs), and never simply textual content. This implies GPT-5.2 Professional Imaginative and prescient performs strongly on summary reasoning duties even when visible interpretation is required.

Now think about an AI so clever that it scores a 135 on the IQ take a look at, even after deciphering complicated photographs and visible patterns. Up till a few years again, we might’ve thought it to be solely doable in a sci-fi film.

6. GPT-5.2

Mensa Norway IQ: 126

After the Professional and Pondering fashions are achieved with, OpenAI’s newest commonplace mannequin takes the stage. However thoughts you, it’s by no means much less on the subject of intelligence, particularly so as compared with people. A rating of 126 already locations it above roughly 98% of the human inhabitants, firmly separating it from what we take into account common human reasoning capability.

This rating displays GPT-5.2’s power in dealing with traditional IQ-style duties reminiscent of sample recognition, logical sequencing, and rule-based drawback fixing. Whereas it doesn’t push into the acute higher ranges like its Professional or Pondering variants, it stays constantly sturdy throughout structured reasoning challenges.

In sensible phrases, GPT-5.2 represents the purpose the place AI reasoning clearly crosses into elite human territory. It might not high the charts, however even at this degree, it outperforms the overwhelming majority of individuals on managed intelligence checks.

7. Kimi K2 Pondering

Mensa Norway IQ: 124

Subsequent up is Kimi K2 Pondering, a mannequin that will not seize headlines as loudly as some Western counterparts. But, it nonetheless resonates amongst AI fans globally, and for good motive. A rating of 124 clearly reveals it above the human common, and nicely into the vary related to sturdy analytical capability.

This end result highlights Kimi K2 Pondering’s functionality on structured reasoning duties. In sensible phrases, Kimi K2 Pondering demonstrates that high-level summary reasoning is now not restricted to a small group of flagship fashions. Even outdoors absolutely the high scorers, fashionable LLMs at the moment are constantly working above common human intelligence on standardised checks. Is it a pattern? Or a reality ready to be established? We will discover out in time.

8. Claude Opus 4.5

Mensa Norway IQ: 124

Matching Kimi K2 Pondering is Claude Opus 4.5, Anthropic’s flagship reasoning mannequin, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 124. That’s smarter than the human common, and a agency indicator of sturdy analytical and problem-solving capability.

The rating displays Claude Opus 4.5’s competence on summary reasoning duties that demand consistency and logical management. Which means – Claude Opus 4.5 demonstrates that sturdy, human-above-average reasoning, even outdoors the top-tier LLMs.

9. Gemini 3 Professional Preview (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 123

Only a step under its text-only counterpart sits Gemini 3 Professional Preview Imaginative and prescient, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 123. This rating is much more notable because it comes from a vision-enabled mannequin. Which suggests Gemini 3 Professional Preview Imaginative and prescient is required to interpret visible patterns and relationships earlier than making use of logic.

In different phrases, the shift from text-only to vision-based inputs doesn’t decrease its reasoning efficiency. Even below tougher-than-usual circumstances, it continues to carry out at a degree most people don’t attain on standardised intelligence checks.

10. Claude Sonnet 4.5

Mensa Norway IQ: 123

Sharing the identical Mensa Norway IQ rating of 123 is Claude Sonnet 4.5, Anthropic’s extra balanced reasoning mannequin. Whereas not positioned as essentially the most excessive thinker within the lineup, it comfortably outperforms the human baseline when it comes to logical reasoning capability.

The end result displays Claude Sonnet 4.5’s regular efficiency on structured problem-solving duties. It’s possible you’ll need to be aware that even in a extra environment friendly kind, Sonnet 4.5 exceeds the reasoning capabilities of most people.

11. GPT-5.2 Pondering (Imaginative and prescient)

Mensa Norway IQ: 111

Let me be clear right here: an IQ-style take a look at is unforgiving to vision-enabled programs. Earlier than a mannequin can apply motive for an answer, and get a excessive rating, it should first accurately interpret shapes, patterns, and spatial relationships. Primarily, that is precisely how we people interpret data. We see, interpret, after which motive. Nonetheless, doing so for AI is a complete different activity in itself.

So, by any means, don’t consider GPT-5.2 Pondering Imaginative and prescient’s IQ rating of 111 as commonplace by any means. It principally signifies that this mannequin is doing one thing tougher: considering whereas seeing. A single mistake made in interpretation will certainly trickle right down to the answer.

GPT-5.2 Pondering Imaginative and prescient thus doesn’t chase elite summary scores. Nonetheless, it demonstrates one thing a lot, far more essential: usable intelligence in messy, multimodal environments. And as AI strikes nearer to the true world, that will simply be essentially the most fascinating characteristic in an AI mannequin, if not already.

12. Manus

Mensa Norway IQ: 111

Sitting at an IQ rating of 111 is Manus, a mannequin that proves intelligence doesn’t all the time imply “excessive.” A rating like this already locations Manus above the human common, however extra importantly, it indicators reliable reasoning and consistency.

Which principally signifies that it could not remedy the toughest puzzles at file velocity, but it surely avoids the sorts of breakdowns that always plague weaker fashions. That is usable intelligence at its finest.

13. GPT-4o

Mensa Norway IQ: 109

With a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 109, GPT-4o sits simply above the human common. Whereas this will appear modest in comparison with the fashions larger up the record, it nonetheless marks a transparent departure from what was thought of “succesful” AI not too way back.

This rating displays GPT-4o’s capability to deal with primary summary reasoning and sample recognition with out falling aside. It might not excel at complicated multi-step puzzles, but it surely performs reliably on easier logic duties. That is precisely what most people, together with myself, want for on a regular basis drawback fixing.

In a approach, this represents accessible intelligence. Whereas it isn’t constructed to dominate IQ charts, it reveals how AI fashions can barely exceed common human reasoning and be useful with our day by day duties.

14. DeepSeek R1

Mensa Norway IQ: 109

Matching GPT-4o is DeepSeek R1, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 109. Like GPT-4o, that is competing reasoning, accessible to people across the globe. All of it, with none sharp drop-offs as seen in much less succesful programs.

In easy phrases, it’s possible you’ll take into account DeepSeek R1 as reliable baseline intelligence. It reveals that even fashions not designed for peak reasoning efficiency can nonetheless meet, and barely exceed, common human reasoning on standardised IQ-style checks.

15. Llama 4 Maverick

Mensa Norway IQ: 107

With a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 107, Llama 4 Maverick sits barely above the common human baseline. As a minimum, it depicts a degree of intelligence that’s meaningfully higher than likelihood or shallow sample matching.

Consider Llama 4 Maverick as an entry-level reasoning competence amongst fashionable LLMs. It reveals that even fashions not designed for superior problem-solving will be of use for people in duties which might be past the capabilities of a median human.

16. DeepSeek V3

Mensa Norway IQ: 103

Closing the record is DeepSeek V3, with a Mensa Norway IQ rating of 103. This locations the mannequin simply solely simply above the human common IQ. It additionally signifies that the DeepSeek V3 can deal with elementary sample recognition and easy logical relationships with out main errors.

That is the decrease certain of what fashionable LLMs can now obtain on intelligence benchmarks. Even at this degree, the takeaway is obvious: AI programs have crossed the edge the place common human reasoning is now not the bar to clear – it’s the baseline.

What This Listing Implies

Don’t consider this record as a leaderboard indicating the neatest AI fashions. Whereas it does so in a approach, the rating is just not an absolute illustration of smartness in any approach.

Its actual worth lies elsewhere – it makes a robust level that structured reasoning is now not restricted to people. Throughout fashions, architectures, and organisations, AI programs at the moment are matching, and sometimes exceeding, human efficiency on IQ checks that have been as soon as thought of troublesome even for skilled people.

That stated, the context right here will all the time be restricted. This rating doesn’t indicate creativity, consciousness, or human-like understanding. These fashions don’t possess intent, feelings, or self-awareness. They don’t “suppose” in the best way people do. What they show with their respective scores as an alternative is one thing far narrower, but profound. AI can now remedy summary, logic-driven issues simply as nicely, if not higher, than people.

Conclusion

This text is just not meant to touch upon the intelligence conflict of AI vs people. It merely proves one level – human-level reasoning is now not the ceiling. This record reveals how shortly massive language fashions have crossed thresholds that when outlined distinctive intelligence, at the very least in test-measured phrases.

On the similar time, these scores remind us what intelligence isn’t. They don’t indicate creativity, consciousness, or understanding. What they do present is that structured reasoning has develop into low cost, quick, and scalable. And because of that, the true differentiator shifts again to people. We are able to now determine what issues to resolve, as an alternative of the way to remedy them.