Hearken to this text  |
Work together Evaluation’ survey gave insights into what finish customers anticipate from autonomous cell robots. | Supply: Adobe Inventory
Cellular robots have turn out to be a necessary a part of the automation panorama in recent times. For finish customers, they provide flexibility, scalability, and effectivity for varied industries and functions. However what do clients truly need from cell robots, and the way do they consider and choose totally different applied sciences and distributors?
Work together Evaluation, a market analysis agency, revealed the outcomes of its 2024 Cellular Robots Purchaser Survey. The worldwide survey coated the preferences, expectations, and challenges of finish customers of cell automation. The corporate talked to 300 patrons and customers of cell robots, masking totally different firm sizes, sectors, and areas.
With the survey, Work together Evaluation hoped to make clear the present and future adoption of cell robots, the elements that affect buying selections, and the ache factors and advantages of utilizing cell automation.
Cellular robots are common with bigger producers
The survey confirmed that cell robotic adoption is rising throughout totally different industries, however not on the similar tempo in every sector. Ninety-five p.c of respondents stated they already use some type of cell automation of their services, reminiscent of automated forklifts, platforms, conveyors, and autonomous cell robots (AMRs). This proportion, nonetheless, diversified enormously by firm measurement and sector.
Bigger firms, with revenues over $1 billion, had been extra probably to make use of cell robots than smaller ones. Producers, particularly these within the automotive, electrical, and semiconductor sectors, had been additionally extra probably to make use of cell robots than retailers, third-party logistics (3PLs), or different industries.
Seventy-one p.c of respondents stated they solely partially automated their workflows with cell robots, indicating there’s nonetheless room for enchancment and enlargement of cell automation.
Relating to rising applied sciences, synthetic intelligence was essentially the most generally talked about rising pattern that clients had been involved in, particularly when it got here to cell automation.
Then again, clients weren’t very acquainted with the VDA 5050 customary for communication and interoperability. Solely 20% of respondents stated they had been absolutely conscious of it, and solely 8% stated it was or would quickly be a compulsory requirement of their buying decision-making between cell robots and fleet managers developed by the German Affiliation of the Automotive Business (VDA).
Prospects extra involved with price than loyalty, says Work together Evaluation
On common, respondents used 3.4 totally different cell robotic manufacturers. | Supply: Work together Evaluation
Work together Evaluation’ survey revealed that price and integration difficulties are the principle limitations and drivers of cell robotic adoption, and that these had been two main elements for each know-how and vendor choice. The most typical cause for not utilizing cell robots was the excessive value or perceived lack of return on funding (ROI), adopted by environmental elements reminiscent of ground suitability, area constraints, or local weather.
Prospects will not be loyal to at least one cell robotic model or kind, in keeping with the survey. As a substitute, they might reasonably use a number of manufacturers and kinds for various workflows and services.
On common, respondents used 3.4 totally different cell robotic manufacturers, and 123 totally different manufacturers had been talked about in whole, reflecting the fragmentation and variety of the market.
ABB was essentially the most talked about model, adopted by OMRON, KUKA, and Locus Robotics. Nonetheless, when survey takers had been requested which model they take into account primarily based in school, the solutions diversified by business and functions Work together Evaluation plans to share these outcomes will probably be coming at a later date.
Prospects did point out they like to make use of the identical cell robotic manufacturers throughout totally different workflows in the identical constructing, however not essentially throughout totally different buildings or services of their community. This implies clients care little about robotic interoperability inside a facility.
When choosing a vendor, a very powerful elements had been the seller’s observe file, integration experience, and native/on-site assist, adopted by the soundness and measurement of the seller. Worth and product vary had been much less necessary than the seller’s fame and repair, the survey discovered.
Chinese language distributors weren’t very fashionable amongst clients, with solely 20% of respondents saying they’d used or would think about using them sooner or later. The most typical causes for not contemplating Chinese language distributors had been safety issues, efficiency points, issues of safety, and authorized causes.
Main limitations to adopting cell robots are lack of accessible price range and different competing priorities. | Supply: Work together Evaluation
What are buyer cell robotic expectations?
The survey discovered the commonest cause for needing to automate was the need to scale back working prices, adopted by the necessity to enhance reliability and accuracy. Surprisingly, a scarcity of labor was not one of many greatest causes for automation.
When choosing know-how for an automation venture, the bottom lifetime price and the benefit/pace of integration had been a very powerful elements, adopted by system flexibility and efficiency.
When automating, clients anticipate a fast return on funding (ROI) and clean implementation from cell robots. Eighty p.c of respondents anticipated an ROI inside three years, with most of these anticipating it between 18 months and three years. 3PLs sometimes anticipated a faster ROI than different sectors.
Prospects sometimes measure the success of robotic implementation by quite a lot of totally different metrics. The most typical metrics used to measure the success of cell robotic implementation had been ROI, productiveness, throughput, accuracy, and value discount.
Earlier than making a remaining buy, clients additionally anticipated to see the automation system in motion, both via an in-house demo, a reference web site go to, or a go to to the provider’s demo middle. Through the buying and implementation course of, the commonest ache factors had been operation slowdowns, routing and tasking difficulties, and issues with integrating with inner software program.
As soon as a robotic was operational, the commonest ache factors had been lack of upkeep prediction, pricey downtime, and an excessive amount of guide intervention required.
“The survey supplies useful insights for cell robotic suppliers and integrators who need to higher perceive and serve their clients,” acknowledged Ash Sharma, chief industrial officer and vp of analysis for robotics and warehouse automation at Work together Evaluation.
