Kovač, A., Paranos, M. & Marciuš, D. Hydrogen in power transition: a overview. Int. J. Hydrog. Power 46, 10016–10035 (2021).
Johnson, N. et al. Practical roles for hydrogen sooner or later power transition. Nat. Rev. Clear. Technol. 1, 351–371 (2025).
Horri, B. A. & Ozcan, H. Inexperienced hydrogen manufacturing by water electrolysis: present standing and challenges. Curr. Opin. Inexperienced Maintain. Chem. 47, 100932 (2024).
Tüysüz, H. Alkaline water electrolysis for inexperienced hydrogen manufacturing. Acc. Chem. Res. 57, 558–567 (2024).
Liu, R.-T. et al. Latest advances in proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 52, 5652–5683 (2023).
IRENA Inexperienced Hydrogen Value Discount: Scaling up Electrolysers to Meet the 1.5 °C Local weather Aim (IRENA, 2020).
Chen, Y. et al. Key elements and design technique for a proton trade membrane water electrolyzer. Small Struct. 4, 2200130 (2023).
Wang, C. & Feng, L. Latest advances and views of Ir-based anode catalysts in PEM water electrolysis. Power Adv. 3, 14–29 (2024).
PGM administration. Johnson Matthey https://matthey.com/products-and-markets/pgms-and-circularity/pgm-management (2025).
Minke, C., Suermann, M., Bensmann, B. & Hanke-Rauschenbach, R. Is iridium demand a possible bottleneck within the realization of large-scale PEM water electrolysis?. Int. J. Hydrog. Power 46, 23581–23590 (2021).
Clapp, M., Zalitis, C. M. & Ryan, M. Views on present and future iridium demand and iridium oxide catalysts for PEM water electrolysis. Catal. Immediately 420, 114140 (2023).
Riedmayer, R., Paren, B. A., Schofield, L., Shao-Horn, Y. & Mallapragada, D. Proton trade membrane electrolysis efficiency targets for attaining 2050 enlargement objectives constrained by iridium provide. Power Fuels 37, 8614–8623 (2023).
Wang, Q. et al. Lengthy-term stability challenges and alternatives in acidic oxygen evolution electrocatalysis. Angew. Chem. 135, e202216645 (2023).
Hou, L. et al. Methods for the design of ruthenium-based electrocatalysts towards acidic oxygen evolution response. EES Catal. 1, 619–644 (2023).
Wu, Z.-Y. et al. Non-iridium-based electrocatalyst for sturdy acidic oxygen evolution response in proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Nat. Mater. 22, 100–108 (2023.
Hrbek, T., Kúš, P., Kosto, Y., Rodríguez, M. G. & Matolínová, I. Magnetron-sputtered thin-film catalyst with low-Ir-Ru content material for water electrolysis: long-term stability and degradation evaluation. J. Energy Sources 556, 232375 (2023).
Cheng, J., Zhang, H., Chen, G. & Zhang, Y. Research of IrxRu1−xO2 oxides as anodic electrocatalysts for stable polymer electrolyte water electrolysis. Electrochim. Acta 54, 6250–6256 (2009).
Huynh, T. B. N. et al. Ir–Ru electrocatalysts embedded in N-doped carbon matrix for proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2301999 (2023).
Wen, Y. et al. Stabilizing extremely energetic Ru websites by suppressing lattice oxygen participation in acidic water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 6482–6490 (2021).
Joo, J. et al. Mn-dopant differentiating the Ru and Ir oxidation states in catalytic oxides towards sturdy oxygen evolution response in acidic electrolyte. Small Strategies 6, 2101236 (2022).
Zhu, W. et al. Steady and oxidative charged Ru improve the acidic oxygen evolution response exercise in two-dimensional ruthenium–iridium oxide. Nat. Commun. 14, 5365 (2023).
Pantò, F., Siracusano, S., Briguglio, N. & Aricò, A. S. Sturdiness of a recombination catalyst-based membrane-electrode meeting for electrolysis operation at excessive present density. Appl. Power 279, 115809 (2020).
Siracusano, S. et al. New insights into the soundness of a excessive efficiency nanostructured catalyst for sustainable water electrolysis. Nano Power 40, 618–632 (2017).
Tao, L. et al. Mass-efficient catalyst layer of hierarchical sub-nanosheets on nanowire for sensible proton trade membrane electrolyzer. Joule 8, 450–460 (2024).
Electrolyzer MEA – 3 Layer. FUELCELL Retailer https://www.fuelcellstore.com/electrolyzer-ccm (2025).
Chen, F.-Y., Wu, Z.-Y., Adler, Z. & Wang, H. Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution response: From mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule 5, 1704–1731 (2021).
Escudero-Escribano, M. et al. Significance of floor IrOx in stabilizing RuO2 for oxygen evolution. J. Phys. Chem. B 122, 947–955 (2018).
Kasian, O. et al. On the origin of the improved ruthenium stability in RuO2–IrO2 combined oxides. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, F3099–F3104 (2016).
Escalera-López, D. et al. Part- and floor composition-dependent electrochemical stability of ir-ru nanoparticles throughout oxygen evolution response. ACS Catal. 11, 9300–9316 (2021).
Zagalskaya, A. & Alexandrov, V. Position of defects within the interaction between adsorbate evolving and lattice oxygen mechanisms of the oxygen evolution response in RuO2 and IrO2. ACS Catal. 10, 3650–3657 (2020).
Klyukin, Ok., Zagalskaya, A. & Alexandrov, V. Position of dissolution intermediates in selling oxygen evolution response at RuO2(110) floor. J. Phys. Chem. C 123, 22151–22157 (2019).
Cherevko, S. et al. Dissolution of noble metals throughout oxygen evolution in acidic media. ChemCatChem 6, 2219–2223 (2014).
She, L. et al. On the sturdiness of iridium-based electrocatalysts towards the oxygen evolution response underneath acid surroundings. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2108465 (2022).
Park, W. & Chung, D. Y. Exercise–stability relationships in oxygen evolution response. ACS Mater. Au 5, 1–10 (2025).
Kumar, S. S. & Lim, H. Latest advances in hydrogen manufacturing by proton trade membrane water electrolysis—a overview. Maintain. Power Fuels 7, 3560–3583 (2023).
Kuhnert, E., Hacker, V. & Bodner, M. A overview of accelerated stress assessments for enhancing MEA sturdiness in PEM water electrolysis cells. Int. J. Power Res. 2023, 1–23 (2023).
Jin, H. et al. Dynamic rhenium dopant boosts ruthenium oxide for sturdy oxygen evolution. Nat. Commun. 14, 354 (2023).
Solar, H. & Jung, W. Latest advances in doped ruthenium oxides as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution response. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 15506–15521 (2021).
Technical targets for proton trade membrane electrolysis. US Division of Power https://www.power.gov/eere/fuelcells/technical-targets-proton-exchange-membrane-electrolysis (2022).
Kong, S. et al. Acid-stable manganese oxides for proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Nat. Catal. 7, 252–261 (2024).
Ram, R. et al. Water-hydroxide trapping in cobalt tungstate for proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Science 384, 1373–1380 (2024).
Chong, L. et al. La- and Mn-doped cobalt spinel oxygen evolution catalyst for proton trade membrane electrolysis. Science 380, 609–616 (2023).
Pan, S. et al. Environment friendly and secure noble-metal-free catalyst for acidic water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 13, 2294 (2022).
Jo, S. et al. Nonprecious high-entropy chalcogenide glasses-based electrocatalysts for environment friendly and secure acidic oxygen evolution response in proton trade membrane water electrolysis. Adv. Power Mater. 13, 2301420 (2023).
Li, A. et al. Atomically dispersed hexavalent iridium oxide from MnO2 discount for oxygen evolution catalysis. Science 384, 666–670 (2024).
Flores, R. A. et al. Lively studying accelerated discovery of secure iridium oxide polymorphs for the oxygen evolution response. Chem. Mater. 32, 5854–5863 (2020).
Nong, H. N. et al. A novel oxygen ligand surroundings facilitates water oxidation in hole-doped IrNiOx core–shell electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1, 841–851 (2018).
Lee, W. H. et al. Excessive crystallinity design of Ir-based catalysts drives catalytic reversibility for water electrolysis and gas cells. Nat. Commun. 12, 4271 (2021).
Shi, Z. et al. Confined Ir single websites with triggered lattice oxygen redox: towards boosted and sustained water oxidation catalysis. Joule 5, 2164–2176 (2021).
Zheng, X. et al. Ir-Sn pair-site triggers key oxygen radical intermediate for environment friendly acidic water oxidation. Sci. Adv. 9, eadi8025 (2023).
Wang, M. & Feng, Z. Pitfalls in X-ray absorption spectroscopy evaluation and interpretation: a sensible information for normal customers. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 30, 100803 (2021).
Laha, S. et al. Ruthenium oxide nanosheets for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis in acidic medium. Adv. Power Mater. 9, 1803795 (2019).
Liu, H. et al. Eliminating over-oxidation of ruthenium oxides by niobium for extremely secure electrocatalytic oxygen evolution in acidic media. Joule 7, 558–573 (2023).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Environment friendly iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169–11186 (1996).
Kresse, G. & Furthmüller, J. Effectivity of ab-initio whole power calculations for metals and semiconductors utilizing a plane-wave foundation set. Comput. Mater. Sci. 6, 15–50 (1996).
Perdew, J. P., Burke, Ok. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made easy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).
Grimme, S., Antony, J., Ehrlich, S. & Krieg, H. A constant and correct ab initio parametrization of density useful dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 parts H–Pu. J. Chem. Phys. 132, 154104 (2010).
Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave technique. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994).
Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H. & Teller, E. Equation of state calculations by quick computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087–1092 (1953).
Leshchev, D. et al. The Inside Shell Spectroscopy beamline at NSLS-II: a facility for in situ and operando X-ray absorption spectroscopy for supplies analysis. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 29, 1095–1106 (2022).
Lin, Y. et al. Chromium–ruthenium oxide stable resolution electrocatalyst for extremely environment friendly oxygen evolution response in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 10, 162 (2019).