When iRobot filed for Chapter 11 chapter final Sunday, it marked the tip of an period for one among America’s most beloved robotics corporations. The Roomba maker, which had offered over 50 million robots since its 2002 launch, had survived 35 years of near-death experiences and technical challenges solely to be undone by what founder Colin Angle calls “avoidable” regulatory opposition.
The collapse adopted Amazon’s January 2024 determination to scuttle its $1.7 billion acquisition of iRobot after 18 months of investigation by the FTC and European regulators. On this candid dialog, Angle displays on what he describes as a profoundly irritating course of, the chilling message it sends to entrepreneurs, and his dedication to maneuver ahead with a brand new enterprise in shopper robotics.
This interview has been edited for size and readability.
TC: You referred to as the chapter “avoidable” and a “tragedy for shoppers.” Stroll me via what you suppose regulators bought incorrect in blocking the Amazon acquisition.
CA: I believe there’s an actual lesson across the position of the FTC and the European Fee. The aim, after all, is to keep away from the abuses that may occur in monopolies and with the aim of defending shopper alternative and defending innovation.
What occurred was that iRobot and Amazon got here collectively for the expressed function of making extra innovation, extra shopper alternative, at a time when iRobot’s trajectory was truthfully totally different from the place it was a number of years earlier. Within the EU, we had a 12% market share [but it was] declining the place the primary competitor was solely three years outdated available in the market, which is sort of the definition of a vibrant and dynamic market. And in america, iRobot’s market share was greater, but it surely was declining and there have been a number of rising opponents bringing exterior innovation into {the marketplace}.
This could have been a no brainer. This could have been three, 4 weeks of investigation. What occurred as a substitute was a 12 months and a half of pendency, which had a really difficult affect on the flexibility to function an organization and in the end having the acquisition blocked.
Techcrunch occasion
San Francisco
|
October 13-15, 2026
What was that 18-month course of really like? What had been you being requested to do?
The quantity of time and money spent was indescribable. I might not be stunned if over 100,000 paperwork had been created and delivered. iRobot invested a major a part of our discretionary earnings towards fulfilling the necessities that went together with doing the transaction. Amazon was pressured to take a position many, many, many instances that. There was an entire workforce, each inner and exterior staff and legal professionals and economists working to attempt to, in as many various methods as potential — as a result of it appeared like our message was falling on deaf ears — reveal that this acquisition was not going to create a monopolistic scenario.
There was every day exercise for 18 months related to this. Maybe most telling, after I was testifying as a part of being deposed, I had an opportunity to stroll the halls of the FTC. The examiners on their workplace doorways had printouts of offers blocked, like trophies.
Trophies?
To me, it felt so incorrect as an entrepreneur who began this factor actually in my lounge and lived six and a half years by no means having sufficient cash within the financial institution to make payroll, lastly making it via succeeding. Right here’s an company whose acknowledged mission is defending shopper pursuits and serving to america financial system, celebrating as victories each time they shut down M&A, which in a really possible way is the first driver of worth creation for the innovation financial system.
I went into this deposition on the lookout for a good friend. It’s like, “Right here we’re, we’re clearly not in a stronger place, and right here’s an awesome alternative for us. Are you excited for us?” Perhaps that is simply my naïve take popping out, however that’s not the reception I bought. It was, “Why ought to we ever allow them to do that?” It’s like: as a result of it’s good for the buyer — as a result of it’s going to catalyze innovation.
How do you suppose what occurred right here modifications the calculus for startup founders who see acquisition as their exit technique? Do you suppose we’re in a world the place American tech corporations can’t scale via M&A?
Danger has a chilling impact. In case you’re an entrepreneur, your solely possibility is to hope that it doesn’t occur once more. The explanation you and I are speaking is I hope by my phrases I could make it much less possible that it’ll occur once more.
I based a brand new firm and my outlook on exit technique and even commercialization technique is impacted by the experiences I had at iRobot. How can it not be? That precedent creates danger of it occurring once more, and solely via constructive experiences will we begin to dial down the anxiousness that the exits I’m relying on — or as a enterprise capitalist, the exits I’m investing in assuming will occur — will really come via. That danger is factored into the willingness to take a position, the valuation of offers, and the speed of recent firm formation.
It’s exhausting to say there’s X % fewer entrepreneurial begins or exits on account of the chilling message, but it surely actually didn’t assist. Entrepreneurs can use each leg up that we as a nation can present. It’s a rugged journey. When it really works out, it must be a celebration. The FTC is there as a safeguard towards very actual examples of issues gone too far. I’m an enormous believer in checks and balances. However when issues get out of whack, the nation suffers.
Let’s discuss iRobot’s journey. The Roomba didn’t come out for 12 years after the corporate was based. Inform me about these early days.
iRobot was a bunch of individuals in a tutorial lab saying, “We had been promised robots. The place are the robots?” If I may very well be pissed off that I don’t have the robots we had been promised, I ought to do one thing about it. If not us, who? If not now, when?
One of many co-founders, my professor Rod Brooks, had pioneered an AI know-how which allowed the embedding of machine intelligence in low-cost robotics. The mission of the corporate was to construct cool stuff, ship an awesome product, have enjoyable, earn a living, and alter the world.
The primary marketing strategy was “personal mission to the moon, promote the film rights.” We had been possibly the primary firm to fail to do precisely that. However the know-how we developed led to additions to the Mars Pathfinder mission — my title’s up on Mars. We constructed robots that went into the Gulf of Mexico after the Deepwater Horizon catastrophe. We constructed the PackBot, which was the primary robotic ever deployed in a fight mission for the US Military, went into caves in Afghanistan, and have become the first methodology for diffusing improvised explosive gadgets. We’d get postcards: “You saved my life right now.”
When the Fukushima catastrophe occurred, we donated half one million {dollars} value of robots to Japan. We despatched six individuals over to coach Tokyo Electrical Energy Firm staff. These robots had been the primary contained in the reactor doorways, mapped out radiation ranges, and located a path the place an worker might run in, get to the management room, work for a minute and a half, run again out, and solely obtain a lifetime dose of radiation. We had been credited with enabling the shutdown of the reactor.
After which 12 months 12, the Roomba?
I had a workforce that was engaged on toys, and one of many guys mentioned, “Colin, I believe it’s time we will do that. We are able to lastly make the vacuum.” I’m like, “Okay, right here’s $15,000. Two weeks. See what you are able to do.” Two weeks later they got here again and mentioned, “Hey, that’s not dangerous. Perhaps there’s one thing right here.” We scraped and located a bit bit of cash [to build these]. A 12 months and a half later, I satisfied my board that we might construct 10,000 of those robots and we launched them.
It’s actually the media that picked up the story. We had no cash for advertising and marketing. Reporters had been fascinated as a result of we tended to do fascinating issues that had been actual, and so they couldn’t imagine that robotic vacuuming might presumably be actual. [The reaction was:] “My God, it really labored.” We ended up promoting 70,000 robots within the first three months. Then we practically went out of enterprise the subsequent 12 months.
Since you couldn’t accommodate demand?
As a result of we screwed up. The press drove this large preliminary demand — 70,000 robots. So subsequent 12 months we’re going to do 4 instances that. We made 300,000 robots. We even made a tv industrial, however we had been a bunch of geek engineers, so it completely failed. After Cyber Monday we had been sitting with 250,000 robots in our warehouse like, “Oh my God, the world’s going to finish.”
Then one thing good occurred. The man operating our web site mentioned, “Why did gross sales quadruple yesterday?” We hadn’t finished something. What had occurred was Pepsi had began operating a TV advert with Dave Chappelle. He walks into this lovely house, picks up a potato chip, and a Roomba comes out. He’s like, “A vacuum cleaner!” He throws down the potato chip, the vacuum eats it, then chases him. His pants are ripped off. He stands up in boxers. An attractive girl seems, and he says, “Your vacuum cleaner ate my pants.” We offered 250,000 robots in two weeks and realized we knew nothing about advertising and marketing.
Wow! You had no thought Pepsi was incorporating your product into its industrial?
No thought. It was wild. You attempt to do good for thus lengthy and also you get smacked within the face so many instances, after which typically one thing good occurs. You can say due to that loopy second in time, we now have robots. Once we take into consideration simply how fragile a journey it’s — cats driving Roombas was an enormous a part of why we succeeded. Does that make any sense? No, under no circumstances. However we actually didn’t anticipate tens of billions of views of cats driving Roombas.
Sooner or later you began seeing Chinese language opponents like Roborock and Ecovacs adopting lidar navigation years earlier than iRobot. Why did you stick to vision-based navigation for thus lengthy?
We explicitly didn’t put lasers on the robotic. We had the know-how many years in the past as a result of it’s a dead-end know-how. Beneath my strategic path, we had been going to take a position each penny of value towards a vision-based nav and situational understanding system. Your Tesla doesn’t have a laser on it. It’s all vision-based. At the very least Elon agrees with me.
Our strategic plan was for Roomba to be way more than only a vacuum cleaner within the house. To try this, it wants to grasp extra. Lasers usually are not superior know-how — they’ve been round for many years. They’re an expedient answer to a subset of the issues {that a} robotic at house must tackle. A laser won’t ever inform you whether or not you really cleaned the ground or not.
It’s completely true that Chinese language competitors was coming in at lower cost factors. We had been late in constructing a two-in-one robotic — we believed that by separating mopping and vacuuming you can give a greater buyer expertise. The shopper voted that we had been incorrect, and that’s okay. We actually had been first in auto-evac, first in navigation. We had been additionally importantly excluded from the Chinese language market, which is the biggest marketplace for shopper robotics on the earth. That didn’t assist.
What learnings out of your iRobot expertise would you share with different robotics entrepreneurs?
The very first thing I inform all robotics entrepreneurs is: be sure you perceive your market so that you’re constructing one thing that delivers extra worth than it prices to create. Robots are so thrilling, so horny that it’s very easy to persuade your self that you just’re doing one thing that’s going to vary the world, if solely shoppers had been good sufficient to appreciate it. That’s a reasonably robust equation.
Know-how is oftentimes within the robotic house nicely forward of the enterprise plans that may reap the benefits of the know-how. One of many traps is considering of robotics as a factor versus a toolkit. As quickly as you say, “I’m going to construct a robotic,” and head off constructing your humanoid — are you actually doing it since you perceive an issue you’re making an attempt to resolve, or are you enamored with constructing your factor?
After I began iRobot, it was simply assumed that robots had been going to hoover flooring by constructing humanoids to push upright vacuum cleaners. Once we first constructed Roomba, we might ask individuals, “Is {that a} robotic?” Folks would say, “No, that’s not a robotic. A robotic has legs and arms and a head.” But Roomba on the time value 10,000 instances lower than a humanoid pushing an upright vacuum.
The problem of entrepreneurship is breaking via the romance and alternative and falling in love along with your know-how and attending to the appliance that you just’re making an attempt to resolve. Perceive your shopper, perceive the issue you’re making an attempt to resolve — as a result of it’s sophisticated, robotics is dear, and it takes quite a lot of power to get proper.
You talked about you’ve based a new firm. What are you able to inform me about it?
We’re in stealth mode, however I’ll provide you with a broad trace. It’s consumer-facing. We’re actually the truth that many of the issues robots can do to satisfy excellent wants require us to work together with different individuals. So how will we construct a robotic that really has ample emotional sophistication — not human-level, however sufficient — to construct a permanent co-character that may make sense over time and use that for well being and wellness associated functions?
It’s going to be superior. I’m so enthusiastic about it. It’s given me enthusiasm and power to have an opportunity to make use of this new toolkit and proceed on my journey to construct the robots we had been promised. I actually haven’t modified that a lot from a grad scholar in faculty saying, “Oh my God, we’ve been promised robots and we don’t have those that I would like but.” I spent 30 years targeted on constructing the world’s best flooring care robotic, and now I’ve an opportunity to do one thing else.
For extra from this interview with Angle, together with his tackle whether or not humanoid robots will ever work, take a look at TechCrunch’s StrictlyVC Obtain podcast — new episodes drop each Tuesday, and the total dialog will likely be accessible quickly.